Thu 28 Jun 2007
In-House Manufacture Movement or ETA?
Posted by The Breitling Source under General Posts[3] Comments
One of the things that often determines the price of a watch is the Movement, usually it’s whether or not the watch has an In-house movement, or some sort of stock or modified movement such as one from ETA or someone else. With the large amount of companies now moving to manufacture movements, it is making them much more affordable. Here are some examples:
Omega now almost exlusively their own in-house Co-Axial base movement in all their watches.
Ebel has developed their own manufacture movement but has yet to use it throughout their whole line, I believe.
Nomos, a small horology house from Germany creates in-house movements at a fraction of the cost of most of the big players out there.
Chopard released their L.U.C. movement a few years back now, with beautifully crafted microrotor designs, not typical of a primarily Jewelry design house.
Tag Heuer has started with some in-house movements, the Tag Heuer Caliber 360 which does have a ETA 2893 base movement, but the 1/100th second chronograph module that has been added to it is completely original and has been patented. This still does not include the new prototype movement for the Monaco V4.
There are a ton more, but in addition to the major Manufactures out there such as Franck Muller, Patek Phillipe, Vacheron Constantin, Piaget, A Lange & Sohne, Glashutte Original, Breguet, etc, there are new players now, providing arguably the same quality unique in-house movements maybe without some of the nicer aesthetic features of the movements and how they are put together. Seeing an A Lange & Sohne movement in action is truly an experience like no other.
But is it worth the money? A swiss-made watch using an off-the-shelf ETA 2824-2 movement will cost you about $200. A Breitling using the same movement in a kit form with several modified and replaced parts will run you about $2000. A Patek with the same type of basic movement will cost you upwards of $15,000. A Nomos with an automatic manufacture movement will cost you no more than the Breitling, with the added “benefit” of a manufacture movement. Now, is that really a benefit? Sometimes that is a detriment as some watchmakers may have a harder time working with an unfamiliar movement, in which case you may have to send it back to Germany for servicing or repair, while just about any watchmaker can fix or clean an ETA 2824-2.
Now, which one is better? Certainly the COSC Breitling will be very close to the Patek in accuracy, but tests usually show that Pateks and other high-end horology houses have better accuracy, perhaps due to regulation after the watch is assembled… which ensures consistancy across the board. Mass-produced products like Breitlings will likely not be tested after assembly.
The Nomos is also extremely accurate, and tho not COSC claim to be within COSC specifications. The standard drop-in ETA movements are not as accurate as the COSC movements, and cannot be unless they are modified and tweaked. They also dont have the level of decoration that the Breitling movements will, which is not really an issue for many people especially since you can’t see most Breitlings movements from the outside anyway!
So in the end, its ultimately a personal choice as to which watch and movement you choose, and likely will have a lot to do with your budget as to which watch you choose. Happy shopping!
June 25th, 2009 at 8:30 am
[…] the most expensive in the world. The majority of Swiss-Made watches’ movements are created by ETA SA, a company with several models of movements that are mass-produced and shipped out to Swiss watch […]
June 25th, 2009 at 9:14 am
[…] A recent trend in the Swiss watch industry has been the switch to in-house movement production: […]
May 22nd, 2010 at 11:59 am
What about Gallet Watch. They have been manufacturing their own movements for years, as well as privately supplying modules to a number of the others. They are worth a notice.