<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ocean7 LM-6c Chronograph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2010/02/18/ocean7-lm-6c-chronograph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2010/02/18/ocean7-lm-6c-chronograph/</link>
	<description>Not only Breitling watches, here we love and discuss all watches.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:50:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Breitling Source</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2010/02/18/ocean7-lm-6c-chronograph/comment-page-1/#comment-32365</link>
		<dc:creator>The Breitling Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/?p=1438#comment-32365</guid>
		<description>Have to agree with you there.. the lume on this one, especially my skeleton hands version, is not very good at all. It is a very nice looking watch, but I would hesistate to say better looking than the Rolex Sub.. as the sub is a very different looking watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree with you there.. the lume on this one, especially my skeleton hands version, is not very good at all. It is a very nice looking watch, but I would hesistate to say better looking than the Rolex Sub.. as the sub is a very different looking watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hudson</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2010/02/18/ocean7-lm-6c-chronograph/comment-page-1/#comment-32364</link>
		<dc:creator>hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/?p=1438#comment-32364</guid>
		<description>I just purchased this watch. I am a avid diver and a collector of dive &amp; pilot watches. This is the best value for the money ever the watch is flawless except the lume is really bad. This watch is as good and better looking than rolex sub</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased this watch. I am a avid diver and a collector of dive &amp; pilot watches. This is the best value for the money ever the watch is flawless except the lume is really bad. This watch is as good and better looking than rolex sub</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2010/02/18/ocean7-lm-6c-chronograph/comment-page-1/#comment-22169</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/?p=1438#comment-22169</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve admired this watch for awhile, and I&#039;ve noticed the price drop. While $1599 is not a bad price for a watch with a 7750, it was a little high and probably appropriately priced at $899. However for a company to do that is ridiculous. Regardless of what people say, resale value is important to a lot of watch collectors and that essentially screws people who bought some of the first run.

It&#039;s still a nice watch but that really puts a sour taste in my mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve admired this watch for awhile, and I&#8217;ve noticed the price drop. While $1599 is not a bad price for a watch with a 7750, it was a little high and probably appropriately priced at $899. However for a company to do that is ridiculous. Regardless of what people say, resale value is important to a lot of watch collectors and that essentially screws people who bought some of the first run.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a nice watch but that really puts a sour taste in my mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

