<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omega Seamaster &#8211; Chronograph or Standard Model?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/</link>
	<description>Not only Breitling watches, here we love and discuss all watches.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:08:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avid Collector</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-21590</link>
		<dc:creator>Avid Collector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-21590</guid>
		<description>I am an avid watch collector and can find good points with Breitling and Omega both.  They both are very nice watches, both made with a style, fit and finsish like no other.  I honestly think it boils down to personal preference.  Omega is iconic, it&#039;s design and style very recognizable and a great investment.  The same can be said for Breitling.  I am just glad that there are others that can appreciate a fine time piece.  Like anything else, you do get what you pay for.  Good on you my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an avid watch collector and can find good points with Breitling and Omega both.  They both are very nice watches, both made with a style, fit and finsish like no other.  I honestly think it boils down to personal preference.  Omega is iconic, it&#8217;s design and style very recognizable and a great investment.  The same can be said for Breitling.  I am just glad that there are others that can appreciate a fine time piece.  Like anything else, you do get what you pay for.  Good on you my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Breitling Source</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-18317</link>
		<dc:creator>The Breitling Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-18317</guid>
		<description>It might be the configuration.. There are several different Seamaster Chronos.. the 3,6,9 subdial and the 6,9,12 as well as the Titanium models, etc. If they are identical, then there is no other reasons besides one place just trying to charge more I would guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be the configuration.. There are several different Seamaster Chronos.. the 3,6,9 subdial and the 6,9,12 as well as the Titanium models, etc. If they are identical, then there is no other reasons besides one place just trying to charge more I would guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Knight</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-18296</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-18296</guid>
		<description>I have seen different prices for the Seamaster Chronograph. Same watch, but sometimes the price differences can be as high as $800.00. I am looking to purchase one and I have seen 2 in Chicago watch shops one for $2,300.00 and another for $3,110.00. I&#039;m not sure why the discrepencies in prices?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen different prices for the Seamaster Chronograph. Same watch, but sometimes the price differences can be as high as $800.00. I am looking to purchase one and I have seen 2 in Chicago watch shops one for $2,300.00 and another for $3,110.00. I&#8217;m not sure why the discrepencies in prices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Breitling Source</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-11142</link>
		<dc:creator>The Breitling Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-11142</guid>
		<description>Depends on who you talk to.. everyone&#039;s got a different opinion :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on who you talk to.. everyone&#8217;s got a different opinion <img src='http://blog.breitlingsource.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sans</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-11141</link>
		<dc:creator>sans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-11141</guid>
		<description>is omega better than breitling...? i mean seamaster better than breitling superocean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is omega better than breitling&#8230;? i mean seamaster better than breitling superocean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Breitling Source</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>The Breitling Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>I would not consider most modern watches as good investments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not consider most modern watches as good investments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hamish de jong</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>hamish de jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>Hi, what about the seamaster chronograph and its resale value? do you think it is an investment??

Best rgds
Hamish
hamishdj@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, what about the seamaster chronograph and its resale value? do you think it is an investment??</p>
<p>Best rgds<br />
Hamish<br />
<a href="mailto:hamishdj@gmail.com">hamishdj@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Watch Blogosphere Highlights of 2007 &#124; Zip Watches</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Watch Blogosphere Highlights of 2007 &#124; Zip Watches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>[...] The Breitling Watch Blog gave us a pretty detailed comparison of the Omega Seamaster Chronograph vs. Standard Chronometer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Breitling Watch Blog gave us a pretty detailed comparison of the Omega Seamaster Chronograph vs. Standard Chronometer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.breitlingsource.com/2007/12/21/omega-seamaster-chronograph-or-standard-model/#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>Both are beautiful watches. The black one is actually pretty awesome. I think Seamasters are some of the coolest watches on the planet. Speaking of, a Planet Ocean (orange bezel w/steel) is high on my list. I&#039;d like them all so I don&#039;t blame you for getting them both! Enjoy them.

Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both are beautiful watches. The black one is actually pretty awesome. I think Seamasters are some of the coolest watches on the planet. Speaking of, a Planet Ocean (orange bezel w/steel) is high on my list. I&#8217;d like them all so I don&#8217;t blame you for getting them both! Enjoy them.</p>
<p>Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.435 seconds -->
